I recently watched the movie Capote starring Phillip Seymour
Hoffman. The movie is about Truman Capote
and his research for his book, In Cold Blood.
In his research he talks to the men responsible for a gruesome quadruple
murder, and develops a friendship with one of the killers, Perry Smith. It was a good movie once you got over Truman
Capote’s voice.
It was
ironic that I watched it when I di because I had recently had a conversation
with a friend about how history books would be less boring, maybe even
enjoyable if they were written in narrative form. The reason this was ironic is because Truman
Capote’s book, In Cold Blood, is a nonfiction book. It is based completely on fact just as a
history book is but his book is written in narrative form, Capote called it the
non-fiction novel. This book is
considered by some to be his greatest work and he was responsible for Breakfast
at Tiffany’s. The book was a huge
success and it proved my point, people wanted to read a book of facts about a
historical event because it was written.
It started
as just a thought but now it is a belief, if history books were written as
novels more people would read them. They
would still get all of the facts but they would be entertained while reading
them. I someday hope the non-fiction
novel gains popularity I think it would really help students learn, but that’s
just my opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment